Forskning ved Københavns Universitet - Københavns Universitet

Forside

5-Year randomized clinical evaluation of posterior bulk-fill restorations

Publikation: KonferencebidragPosterForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

5-Year randomized clinical evaluation of posterior bulk-fill restorations. / van Dijken, Jan WV ; Pallesen, Ulla.

2016. Poster session præsenteret ved Academy of Dental Materials Annual meeting 2016 , Chicago, USA.

Publikation: KonferencebidragPosterForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

van Dijken, JWV & Pallesen, U 2016, '5-Year randomized clinical evaluation of posterior bulk-fill restorations', Academy of Dental Materials Annual meeting 2016 , Chicago, USA, 12/10/2016 - 15/10/2016.

APA

van Dijken, J. WV., & Pallesen, U. (2016). 5-Year randomized clinical evaluation of posterior bulk-fill restorations. Poster session præsenteret ved Academy of Dental Materials Annual meeting 2016 , Chicago, USA.

Vancouver

van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U. 5-Year randomized clinical evaluation of posterior bulk-fill restorations. 2016. Poster session præsenteret ved Academy of Dental Materials Annual meeting 2016 , Chicago, USA.

Author

van Dijken, Jan WV ; Pallesen, Ulla. / 5-Year randomized clinical evaluation of posterior bulk-fill restorations. Poster session præsenteret ved Academy of Dental Materials Annual meeting 2016 , Chicago, USA.1 s.

Bibtex

@conference{b4cd8a4770d144ac90fd00b8606b0bcd,
title = "5-Year randomized clinical evaluation of posterior bulk-fill restorations",
abstract = "Purpose/aim: To evaluate in a randomized controlled studythe 5-year clinical durability of a flowable resin compositebulk-fill technique in Class I and Class II restorations.Materials and methods: 38 pairs Class I and 62 pairs ClassII restorations were placed in 44 male and 42 female (meanage 52.4 years). Each patient received at least two, as similaras possible, extended Class I or Class II restorations.In all cavities, a 1-step self-etch adhesive (Xeno V+) wasapplied. Randomized, one of the cavities of each pair receivedthe flowable bulk-filled resin composite (SDR), in incrementsup to 4mm as needed to fill the cavity 2mm short of theocclusal cavosurface. The occlusal part was completed withthe nano-hybrid resin composite (Ceram X mono+). In theother cavity, the resin composite-only (Ceram X mono+) wasplaced in 2mm increments. The restorations were evaluatedusing slightly modified USPHS criteria at baseline and thenyearly during 5 years. Caries risk and bruxing habits of theparticipants were estimated.Results: No post-operative sensitivity was reported. At5-year 183, 68 Class I and 115 Class II, restorations were evaluated.Ten restorations failed (5.5{\%}), all Class II, 4 SDR-CeramXmono+ and 6 CeramXmono+-only restorations. The main reasonsfor failurewere tooth fracture (6) and secondary caries (4).The annual failure rate (AFR) for all restorations (Class I and II)was for the bulk-filled-1.1{\%} and for the resin composite-onlyrestorations 1.3{\%}. For the Class II restorations, the AFR was1.4{\%} and 2.1{\%}, respectively.Conclusions: The stress decreasing flowable bulk-fill resincomposite technique showed good durability during the 5-year follow-up.",
keywords = "Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, bulk fill, dental restorations,clinical, resin composite, nana, prsterior, self etch adhesive",
author = "{van Dijken}, {Jan WV} and Ulla Pallesen",
note = "Abstract e94; null ; Conference date: 12-10-2016 Through 15-10-2016",
year = "2016",
language = "English",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - 5-Year randomized clinical evaluation of posterior bulk-fill restorations

AU - van Dijken, Jan WV

AU - Pallesen, Ulla

N1 - Abstract e94

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Purpose/aim: To evaluate in a randomized controlled studythe 5-year clinical durability of a flowable resin compositebulk-fill technique in Class I and Class II restorations.Materials and methods: 38 pairs Class I and 62 pairs ClassII restorations were placed in 44 male and 42 female (meanage 52.4 years). Each patient received at least two, as similaras possible, extended Class I or Class II restorations.In all cavities, a 1-step self-etch adhesive (Xeno V+) wasapplied. Randomized, one of the cavities of each pair receivedthe flowable bulk-filled resin composite (SDR), in incrementsup to 4mm as needed to fill the cavity 2mm short of theocclusal cavosurface. The occlusal part was completed withthe nano-hybrid resin composite (Ceram X mono+). In theother cavity, the resin composite-only (Ceram X mono+) wasplaced in 2mm increments. The restorations were evaluatedusing slightly modified USPHS criteria at baseline and thenyearly during 5 years. Caries risk and bruxing habits of theparticipants were estimated.Results: No post-operative sensitivity was reported. At5-year 183, 68 Class I and 115 Class II, restorations were evaluated.Ten restorations failed (5.5%), all Class II, 4 SDR-CeramXmono+ and 6 CeramXmono+-only restorations. The main reasonsfor failurewere tooth fracture (6) and secondary caries (4).The annual failure rate (AFR) for all restorations (Class I and II)was for the bulk-filled-1.1% and for the resin composite-onlyrestorations 1.3%. For the Class II restorations, the AFR was1.4% and 2.1%, respectively.Conclusions: The stress decreasing flowable bulk-fill resincomposite technique showed good durability during the 5-year follow-up.

AB - Purpose/aim: To evaluate in a randomized controlled studythe 5-year clinical durability of a flowable resin compositebulk-fill technique in Class I and Class II restorations.Materials and methods: 38 pairs Class I and 62 pairs ClassII restorations were placed in 44 male and 42 female (meanage 52.4 years). Each patient received at least two, as similaras possible, extended Class I or Class II restorations.In all cavities, a 1-step self-etch adhesive (Xeno V+) wasapplied. Randomized, one of the cavities of each pair receivedthe flowable bulk-filled resin composite (SDR), in incrementsup to 4mm as needed to fill the cavity 2mm short of theocclusal cavosurface. The occlusal part was completed withthe nano-hybrid resin composite (Ceram X mono+). In theother cavity, the resin composite-only (Ceram X mono+) wasplaced in 2mm increments. The restorations were evaluatedusing slightly modified USPHS criteria at baseline and thenyearly during 5 years. Caries risk and bruxing habits of theparticipants were estimated.Results: No post-operative sensitivity was reported. At5-year 183, 68 Class I and 115 Class II, restorations were evaluated.Ten restorations failed (5.5%), all Class II, 4 SDR-CeramXmono+ and 6 CeramXmono+-only restorations. The main reasonsfor failurewere tooth fracture (6) and secondary caries (4).The annual failure rate (AFR) for all restorations (Class I and II)was for the bulk-filled-1.1% and for the resin composite-onlyrestorations 1.3%. For the Class II restorations, the AFR was1.4% and 2.1%, respectively.Conclusions: The stress decreasing flowable bulk-fill resincomposite technique showed good durability during the 5-year follow-up.

KW - Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences

KW - bulk fill, dental restorations,clinical, resin composite, nana, prsterior, self etch adhesive

M3 - Poster

Y2 - 12 October 2016 through 15 October 2016

ER -

ID: 168557852