Forskning ved Københavns Universitet - Københavns Universitet


A multi-institutional consensus on how to perform endoscopic ultrasound-guided peri-pancreatic fluid collection drainage and endoscopic necrosectomy

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt


  • Jintao Guo
  • Adrian Saftoiu
  • Pietro Fusaroli
  • Marc Giovannini
  • Girish Mishra
  • Surinder S Rana
  • Sammy Ho
  • Jan-Werner Poley
  • Tiing Leong Ang
  • Evangelos Kalaitzakis
  • Ali A Siddiqui
  • Jose G De La Mora-Levy
  • Sundeep Lakhtakia
  • Manoop S Bhutani
  • Malay Sharma
  • Shuntaro Mukai
  • Pramod Kumar Garg
  • Linda S Lee
  • Juan J Vila
  • Everson Artifon
  • Douglas G Adler
  • Siyu Sun

There is a lack of consensus on how endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided pseudocyst drainage and endoscopic necrosectomy should be performed. This survey was carried out amongst members of the EUS Journal Editorial Board to describe their practices in performing this procedure. This was a worldwide multi-institutional survey amongst members of the EUS Journal Editorial Board in May 2017. The responses to a 22-question survey with respect to the practice of EUS-guided pseudocyst drainage and endoscopic necrosectomy were obtained. Twenty-two endoscopists responded to the questionnaire as follows: 72.7% (16/22) were of the opinion that lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) should be the standard of care for the creation of an endoscopic cystenterostomy in patients with pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON); 95.5% (21/22) recommended large diameter (d=15 mm) LAMS for drainage in patients with WON; 54.5% (12/22) would not dilate LAMS after placement into the WOPN; 86.4% (19/22) would not perform endoscopic necrosectomy during the same procedure as the creation of the cystenterostomy; 45.5% (10/22) recommend that agents, such as diluted hydrogen peroxide, should be used to lavage the peri-pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) cavity in patients with WON; and 45.5% (10/22) considered a naso-cystic or other tube to be necessary for lavage of WON after initial drainage. The mean optimal interval recommended for endoscopic necrosectomy procedures after EUS-guided drainage was 6.23 days. The mean optimal interval recommended for repeat imaging in patients undergoing endoscopic necrosectomy was 12.32 days. The mean time recommended for LAMS removal was 4.59 weeks. This is the first worldwide survey on the practice of EUS-guided pseudocyst drainage and endoscopic necrosectomy. There were wide variations in practice and randomized studies are urgently needed to establish the best approach for management of this condition. There is also a pressing need to establish a best practice consensus.

TidsskriftEndoscopic Ultrasound
Udgave nummer5
Sider (fra-til)285-291
Antal sider7
StatusUdgivet - 2017

Antal downloads er baseret på statistik fra Google Scholar og

Ingen data tilgængelig

ID: 186190780