Forskning ved Københavns Universitet - Københavns Universitet

Forside

Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study. / Schroll, Jeppe B.; Moustgaard, Rasmus; Gøtzsche, Peter C.

I: B M C Medical Research Methodology, Bind 11, 2011, s. 22.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Schroll, JB, Moustgaard, R & Gøtzsche, PC 2011, 'Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study', B M C Medical Research Methodology, bind 11, s. 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-22

APA

Schroll, J. B., Moustgaard, R., & Gøtzsche, P. C. (2011). Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study. B M C Medical Research Methodology, 11, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-22

Vancouver

Schroll JB, Moustgaard R, Gøtzsche PC. Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study. B M C Medical Research Methodology. 2011;11:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-22

Author

Schroll, Jeppe B. ; Moustgaard, Rasmus ; Gøtzsche, Peter C. / Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study. I: B M C Medical Research Methodology. 2011 ; Bind 11. s. 22.

Bibtex

@article{499e4932814b4cc7828e0c361ec83171,
title = "Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study",
abstract = "Dealing with heterogeneity in meta-analyses is often tricky, and there is only limited advice for authors on what to do. We investigated how authors addressed different degrees of heterogeneity, in particular whether they used a fixed effect model, which assumes that all the included studies are estimating the same true effect, or a random effects model where this is not assumed.",
author = "Schroll, {Jeppe B.} and Rasmus Moustgaard and G{\o}tzsche, {Peter C}",
year = "2011",
doi = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-22",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "22",
journal = "B M C Medical Research Methodology",
issn = "1471-2288",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study

AU - Schroll, Jeppe B.

AU - Moustgaard, Rasmus

AU - Gøtzsche, Peter C

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Dealing with heterogeneity in meta-analyses is often tricky, and there is only limited advice for authors on what to do. We investigated how authors addressed different degrees of heterogeneity, in particular whether they used a fixed effect model, which assumes that all the included studies are estimating the same true effect, or a random effects model where this is not assumed.

AB - Dealing with heterogeneity in meta-analyses is often tricky, and there is only limited advice for authors on what to do. We investigated how authors addressed different degrees of heterogeneity, in particular whether they used a fixed effect model, which assumes that all the included studies are estimating the same true effect, or a random effects model where this is not assumed.

U2 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-22

DO - http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-22

M3 - Journal article

VL - 11

SP - 22

JO - B M C Medical Research Methodology

JF - B M C Medical Research Methodology

SN - 1471-2288

ER -

ID: 40158026