Forskning ved Københavns Universitet - Københavns Universitet

Forside

Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger"

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Research into the peer review process has previously been conducted in English-language journals. This study deals with a Danish general medical journal with a relatively small pool of both reviewers and readers. The aim of the study was to compare the quality of reviews produced by identifiable and anonymous reviewers, and further to characterize authors' and reviewers' attitudes towards different peer review systems.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
ArtikelnummerA4479
TidsskriftDanish Medical Bulletin (Online)
Vol/bind59
Udgave nummer8
ISSN1603-9629
StatusUdgivet - aug. 2012

ID: 48534891