Forskning ved Københavns Universitet - Københavns Universitet

Forside

Segmentation of age-related white matter changes in a clinical multi-center study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

  • Tim B Dyrby
  • Egill Rostrup
  • William F C Baaré
  • Elisabeth C W van Straaten
  • Frederik Barkhof
  • Hugo Vrenken
  • Stefan Ropele
  • Reinhold Schmidt
  • Timo Erkinjuntti
  • Lars-Olof Wahlund
  • Leonardo Pantoni
  • Domenico Inzitari
  • Paulson, Olaf B.
  • Lars Kai Hansen
  • Waldemar, Gunhild
  • LADIS study group
Age-related white matter changes (WMC) are thought to be a marker of vascular pathology, and have been associated with motor and cognitive deficits. In the present study, an optimized artificial neural network was used as an automatic segmentation method to produce probabilistic maps of WMC in a clinical multi-center study. The neural network uses information from T1- and T2-weighted and fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance (MR) scans, neighboring voxels and spatial location. Generalizability of the neural network was optimized by including the Optimal Brain Damage (OBD) pruning method in the training stage. Six optimized neural networks were produced to investigate the impact of different input information on WMC segmentation. The automatic segmentation method was applied to MR scans of 362 non-demented elderly subjects from 11 centers in the European multi-center study Leukoaraiosis And Disability (LADIS). Semi-manually delineated WMC were used for validating the segmentation produced by the neural networks. The neural network segmentation demonstrated high consistency between subjects and centers, making it a promising technique for large studies. For WMC volumes less than 10 ml, an increasing discrepancy between semi-manual and neural network segmentation was observed using the similarity index (SI) measure. The use of all three image modalities significantly improved cross-center generalizability compared to neural networks using the FLAIR image only. Expert knowledge not available to the neural networks was a minor source of discrepancy, while variation in MR scan quality constituted the largest source of error.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftNeuroImage
Vol/bind41
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)335-345
Antal sider11
ISSN1053-8119
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2008

ID: 10949735