Forskning ved Københavns Universitet - Københavns Universitet

Forside

State or Nature? Formal vs. Informal Sanctioning in the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Dokumenter

  • DP 11-05

    Indsendt manuskript, 782 KB, PDF-dokument

The sanctioning of norm-violating behavior by an effective formal authority is an efficient solution for social dilemmas. It is in the self-interest of voters and is often favorably contrasted with letting citizens take punishment into their own hands. Allowing informal sanctions, by contrast, not only comes with a danger that punishments will be misapplied, but also should have no efficiency benefit under standard assumptions of self-interested agents. We experimentally investigate the relative effectiveness of formal vs. informal sanctions in the voluntary provision of public goods. Unsurprisingly, we find that effective formal sanctions are popular and efficient when they are free to impose. Surprisingly, we find that informal sanctions are often more popular and more efficient when effective formal sanctions entail a modest cost. The reason is that informal sanctions achieve more efficient outcomes than theory predicts, especially when the mechanism is chosen by voting.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
UdgiverDepartment of Economics, University of Copenhagen
Antal sider36
StatusUdgivet - 2011

Bibliografisk note

JEL classification: C92, C91, D03, D71, H41

Antal downloads er baseret på statistik fra Google Scholar og www.ku.dk


Ingen data tilgængelig

ID: 32470962