Forskning ved Københavns Universitet - Københavns Universitet

Forside

Lost in implementation? REDD+ country readiness experiences in Indonesia and Vietnam

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Lost in implementation? REDD+ country readiness experiences in Indonesia and Vietnam. / Casse, Thorkil; Milhøj, Anders; Nielsen, Martin Reinhardt; Meilby, Henrik; Rochmayanto, Yanto.

In: Climate and Development, Vol. 11, No. 9, 2019, p. 799-811.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Casse, T, Milhøj, A, Nielsen, MR, Meilby, H & Rochmayanto, Y 2019, 'Lost in implementation? REDD+ country readiness experiences in Indonesia and Vietnam', Climate and Development, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 799-811. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2018.1562870

APA

Casse, T., Milhøj, A., Nielsen, M. R., Meilby, H., & Rochmayanto, Y. (2019). Lost in implementation? REDD+ country readiness experiences in Indonesia and Vietnam. Climate and Development, 11(9), 799-811. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2018.1562870

Vancouver

Casse T, Milhøj A, Nielsen MR, Meilby H, Rochmayanto Y. Lost in implementation? REDD+ country readiness experiences in Indonesia and Vietnam. Climate and Development. 2019;11(9):799-811. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2018.1562870

Author

Casse, Thorkil ; Milhøj, Anders ; Nielsen, Martin Reinhardt ; Meilby, Henrik ; Rochmayanto, Yanto. / Lost in implementation? REDD+ country readiness experiences in Indonesia and Vietnam. In: Climate and Development. 2019 ; Vol. 11, No. 9. pp. 799-811.

Bibtex

@article{9daba68d783e421386d5c9e9605065a6,
title = "Lost in implementation? REDD+ country readiness experiences in Indonesia and Vietnam",
abstract = "The REDD+ readiness phase leading up to implementation has been slow and has fallen short of expectations. In this article, we present REDD+ experiences from two countries, Indonesia and Vietnam, with a focus on the readiness phase, examining policy processes at the central, provincial and local levels. Interviews with key stakeholders (officials, donors, NGOs, village representatives) and data from household surveys suggest that efforts have been concentrated at the central level, with the provincial level mainly feeding data into the process and the local level practically left to its own devices. Furthermore, the REDD+ design may be misguided as it exempts the major stakeholders, namely the state and private enterprises, from declaring emissions sub-targets in the national carbon reduction action plans, and focuses exclusively on rural forest dwellers who struggle to understand the ideas that underpin REDD+.",
keywords = "environmental governance, REDD+, stakeholders, tree cover",
author = "Thorkil Casse and Anders Milh{\o}j and Nielsen, {Martin Reinhardt} and Henrik Meilby and Yanto Rochmayanto",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/17565529.2018.1562870",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "799--811",
journal = "Climate and Development",
issn = "1756-5529",
publisher = "Earthscan Ltd.",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lost in implementation? REDD+ country readiness experiences in Indonesia and Vietnam

AU - Casse, Thorkil

AU - Milhøj, Anders

AU - Nielsen, Martin Reinhardt

AU - Meilby, Henrik

AU - Rochmayanto, Yanto

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The REDD+ readiness phase leading up to implementation has been slow and has fallen short of expectations. In this article, we present REDD+ experiences from two countries, Indonesia and Vietnam, with a focus on the readiness phase, examining policy processes at the central, provincial and local levels. Interviews with key stakeholders (officials, donors, NGOs, village representatives) and data from household surveys suggest that efforts have been concentrated at the central level, with the provincial level mainly feeding data into the process and the local level practically left to its own devices. Furthermore, the REDD+ design may be misguided as it exempts the major stakeholders, namely the state and private enterprises, from declaring emissions sub-targets in the national carbon reduction action plans, and focuses exclusively on rural forest dwellers who struggle to understand the ideas that underpin REDD+.

AB - The REDD+ readiness phase leading up to implementation has been slow and has fallen short of expectations. In this article, we present REDD+ experiences from two countries, Indonesia and Vietnam, with a focus on the readiness phase, examining policy processes at the central, provincial and local levels. Interviews with key stakeholders (officials, donors, NGOs, village representatives) and data from household surveys suggest that efforts have been concentrated at the central level, with the provincial level mainly feeding data into the process and the local level practically left to its own devices. Furthermore, the REDD+ design may be misguided as it exempts the major stakeholders, namely the state and private enterprises, from declaring emissions sub-targets in the national carbon reduction action plans, and focuses exclusively on rural forest dwellers who struggle to understand the ideas that underpin REDD+.

KW - environmental governance

KW - REDD+

KW - stakeholders

KW - tree cover

U2 - 10.1080/17565529.2018.1562870

DO - 10.1080/17565529.2018.1562870

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85061281532

VL - 11

SP - 799

EP - 811

JO - Climate and Development

JF - Climate and Development

SN - 1756-5529

IS - 9

ER -

ID: 213668549